RSS

Daily Archives: September 10, 2012

USDA Establishes National Watershed Research Network

Read the full story at Agricultural Research.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture‘s (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) today announced that it has established a Long Term Agro-ecosystem Research (LTAR) network from among its existing experimental watersheds and rangelands nationwide to address large-scale, multi-year research, environmental management testing and technology transfer related to the nation’s agricultural ecosystems. ARS is USDA’s chief intramural scientific research agency.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 10, 2012 in Agriculture, Research, Water

 

Air Force joins nation for Pollution Prevention Week 2012

Read the full story from the U.S. Air Force.

In its continuing efforts to educate the public about pollution prevention and reducing the contamination of air, soil and water by eliminating pollution at its source, the Air Force joins the nation Sept. 17-24 for Pollution Prevention Week.

 
 

A close look at product stewardship

Read the full story in Resource Recycling.

The idea that companies should be responsible for end-of-life management of their products has steadily picked up steam as more states adopt producer responsibility laws and industries launch initiatives to recover their wares at the end of their useful lives. But any of these plans has many moving parts that sometimes collide with each other. A panel of individuals on the frontlines of this issue shed some light on what might lay ahead during last week’s Resource Recycling Conference in Austin, Texas.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 10, 2012 in Product stewardship

 

UMass Permaculture 3-Part You-Tube video series

UMass Amherst transformed a 1/4 grass lawn on campus into a thriving, abundant, permaculture garden during the 2010-2011 academic year. Links to the videos:

  1. Sheet Mulching and Soil Preparation
  2. Campus-Wide Design and Initial Planting Phase
  3. Growing a Model Sustainable Campus
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 10, 2012 in Colleges and universities, Landscaping, Video

 

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Biochar Application in the U.S. Cereal Crop Cultivation

Download the document.

Increasing global warming and food insecurity give ample rationale for research on biochar in view of its properties: enhancement of soil fertility and crop productivity, soil water retention and carbon sequestration. As a new technology the introduction of biochar into farming faces challenges and uncertainties, which are highlighted in the report along with the policy implications. Biochar is a type of charcoal created through pyrolysis of biomass. It is a carbonaceous substance produced with the intent to apply to soil for agricultural and environmental management. Biochar use and production can be deemed a mere business activity that should be ruled out by the market; however, due to multi-functionality of biochar properties this technology has important policy implications. Biochar can exert positive externalities, i.e. provide social benefits in the form of carbon sequestration or reduced agricultural water runoff, etc. Biochar, however, has not yet been studied in its entirety, and as such its application in some cases faces risks and uncertainty.

Biochar advocates need to give a convincing argument to farmers about the benefits of biochar application in agronomy. Apart from the considerations of pure financial costs and benefits occurred to an individual farmer, it is necessary to be mindful of the social costs and/or benefits, risks and uncertainties that a new technology may impose on people and the environment.

The research aimed to review the available literature on biochar, conduct a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of the biochar application in the US cereal crop cultivation and give a recommendation to farmers and policy-makers on biochar use. A mix of qualitative and quantitative research methods were sued to collect the data and carry out an analysis over the fall 2011 – spring 2012.

Specifically this research intended to answer the following questions: Do private and social benefits of biochar outweigh its private and social costs? Under what conditions? Is policy needed to promote biochar?

The study was informed by the interviews with farmers from the Amherst area; literature and document review, and personal communication with biochar researchers and stakeholders. A costbenefit analysis (CBA) of the biochar application in the US wheat crop cultivation was conducted to identify the biochar profitability. The CBA used the field data of the Washington State research and the data from biochar studies in the northerly and tropical climates, using the formula “Benefits – Costs > 0” as a criterion. Expert information and the existing literature were used to identify and fill in the gaps in the CBA. Based on the factual data and assumptions the private and social costs were compared to the total benefits ensuing from the biochar application.

Private costs are measured as total costs accrued to a farmer during the purchase and field application of one ton of biochar per ha. Private benefits are measured as financial revenues a farmer gains from the increased wheat yield as a result of biochar soil treatment. This analysis is based on the biochar crop yield effect during the 1st year. It does not consider the prolonged effect of biochar on the wheat yield in the following years. Hence, the private benefits include only the revenues gained in the 1st year with hypothetical revenues ensuing from the biochar yield effects over the following 10 years.

Social costs represent the risks and uncertainties of introducing biochar as a new agricultural technology. This research, though, does not include a specific value for social costs because of the difficulty in quantifying and monetizing the potential increase of soil temperature and loss of crops, biodiversity, and social tension the society may have to pay if biochar shows adverse effects. However, the considerations for social costs are included into the CBA analysis and conclusions. The blanks are identified and filled in with the appropriate use of bounds to manage uncertainty.

Social benefits are measured as benefits accruing from the CO2 sequestration. Benefits resulting from the higher nutritional value and better soil water retention, conservation of biodiversity and higher food security (better yield predictability in the face of weather change), benefits of waste management, and the reduction of methane emissions from landfills are not included in the analysis.

The CBA findings suggest that under the current costs the biochar application in the US cereal crop cultivation does not work privately in the first year because of the high costs of biochar. The 5 inclusion of a multi-year biochar effect on soil fertility and crop productivity, however, can add a significant value to biochar profitability, had the field research proved a positive yield effect.

The findings demonstrate that the CO2 sequestration payments can play a very important role in biochar profitability. The carbon markets are not set up yet, therefore one way to look at biochar promotion is to consider the feasibility of introducing a policy on carbon sequestration payments, or to think of ways of reducing the cost of biochar by increasing the production scale. Meanwhile, farmers may find it profitable to use biochar for cultivation of cash crops that give a high return on investment, or on a small-scale in specific settings (greenhouses, tree nurseries, florist shops, etc.)

Governmental investments in R&D and larger scale biochar applications are required to account for a vast heterogeneity of biochar systems. In the mean time the government should introduce an “incremental” biochar policy regulating current biochar application, while promoting the information exchange among the researchers, policy-makers and practitioners.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 10, 2012 in Agriculture, Biochar, Publications

 

Biochar and Northern Soils

Read the full post from Farm Management Canada.

For farmers in the Yukon, cooler growing conditions, nutrient deficient soils, lack of processing opportunities and high shipping costs are some of the major challenges. However, industry and research efforts are in progress to bring some new innovations and benefits to farmers and industry.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 10, 2012 in Agriculture, Biochar

 

Bio-Possibilities: Researchers turn waste into fuel

Read the full post at the South Dakota State University Collegian.

Dr. Lin Wei, an assistant professor in agricultural and biosystems engineering, has been developing a new method of producing biofuels for two years. That method uses a process called pyrolysis to turn biomass like corn stover and sawdust, which today is often considered waste, into biocrude oil. The oil is then refined into fuels that can “drop-in” to traditional gasoline, diesel or JP-8 jet fuel.

 
 

EWG’s Guide to Healthy Cleaning

EWG’s Guide to Healthy Cleaning reviews and rates more than 2,000 popular household cleaning products with grades A through F, based on the safety of their ingredients and the information they disclose about their contents.

 

UCLA offers city planners manual for creating parklets, living streets

Read the full post at CivSource.

In Los Angeles, California, city officials are looking at new ways to green the city. A recent resolution passed by the council will allow for the creation of a series of micro-parks around the city to provide residents with more green space. On the heels of the resolution, researchers at UCLA have put together a manual for how to build these “parklets,” creating what they call “living streets.” Researchers hope that the manuals, originally targeted at Los Angeles can also be used in other urban areas, greening cities nationwide.

Researchers have also created a new report, “Reclaiming The Right of Way,” which compiles best practices from cities in the U.S and Canada that have implemented parklet projects in their communities. These projects, which enhance neighborhoods through low-cost, small-scale inventions, were pioneered in San Francisco but have also appeared in New York, Philadelphia, and Vancouver, B.C., among other cities.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 10, 2012 in Local government, Publications

 

In L.A.’s ‘pocket parks,’ smart design taking root

Read the full story at SmartPlanet.

Massive urban parks, the likes of Golden Gate or Central, are a real treasure to tourists but they do less for residents who cannot easily access them. In large, dense cities such as Los Angeles, park quantity can trump size. That is why L.A. is in the midst of a campaign to bring 50 “pocket parks” to its densest, least green neighborhoods.

City planners consider pocket parks to be less than 20,000 square feet. They’re designed expressly to serve residents who live within a short walk of the park. But where does a city get access to these lots? In L.A., planners are turning to an unfortunately ample stock of foreclosed homes.

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,099 other followers

%d bloggers like this: